PoliceCensus

Home / States / Iowa / Cedar Falls Police Department

Cedar Falls Police Department

City agency in Black Hawk, Iowa, United States. Reports crime data to the FBI, and has done since 1992.

ORI
IA0070100
Type
City
County
Black Hawk
State
Iowa (IA)
FBI reporting
Reporting since 1992-01-01
Location
42.5367, -92.4481

Workforce

As reported to the FBI for 2025, covering a population of 41,596.

76Sworn officers
1Civilian staff
1.85Employees per 1,000 people
41,596Population served
YearOfficersCiviliansPopulation servedPer 1,000
202576141,5961.85
202473140,7491.82
202372140,7701.79
202271140,2911.79
202066140,6751.65
201960141,2691.48
201854141,9011.31
201743141,7441.05
201640141,6510.98
201540041,2520.97
201440140,8831.00
201342140,2131.07

Officer and civilian counts are full-time employees as filed by the agency in its annual return. A dash means the agency did not report that figure for that year — it does not mean zero.

Crime and clearances

Offences and clearances filed by Cedar Falls Police Department in its monthly returns to the FBI, added up by calendar year, 2019–2026. Violent crime and property crime are the FBI’s two categories. These are the counts as filed: Police Census does not turn them into a rate.

Violent crime
YearMonths filedOffencesClearedCleared as % of offences
20268 of 12321443.8%
202512562646.4%
202410 of 129111.1%
20235 of 122150.0%
20222 of 1200—
202112803543.8%
202012472655.3%
201912573561.4%
Property crime
YearMonths filedOffencesClearedCleared as % of offences
20268 of 1228312142.8%
20251247114129.9%
202410 of 125823.4%
20235 of 12200.0%
20222 of 1201—
20211275614919.7%
2020124946212.6%
20191247714229.8%

Reading the table. “Not reported” means the agency filed nothing for that year; it does not mean zero. A 0 is a figure the agency filed. For 2026 the FBI is still collecting: that year is not complete in the file we read, so where this agency has no 2026 figures the table says “Not yet in the FBI’s file” rather than “Not reported”. We can see that the agency is absent from the file so far; we cannot tell whether it has not filed or has not yet been published, and we do not guess. A year marked “7 of 12” adds up only the months the agency filed, so it is not a full-year total. A dash in the last column means the percentage cannot be worked out: it needs both figures, and at least one offence.

“Cleared” is the FBI file’s clearance count for the year. Clearances in a year can relate to offences from earlier years, so the percentage is not the share of that year’s offences that were solved, and it can exceed 100%. Figures are not adjusted: a year far below the agency’s neighbouring years, or a 0 beside many offences, may reflect what was submitted rather than what happened. The file does not say which, and Police Census does not guess.

Source: FBI Crime Data Explorer, summarized data for agency record IA0070100.

Arrests

Arrests made by Cedar Falls Police Department, all offences combined, as filed with the FBI and added up by calendar year, 2019–2026.

YearMonths filedArrests
20268 of 12426
202512616
202410 of 124
20235 of 122
20222 of 121
202112526
202012320
201912585

“Not reported” means the agency filed nothing for that year; it does not mean zero. A year marked “7 of 12” adds up only the months filed. For 2026 the FBI is still collecting, so an absent agency reads “Not yet in the FBI’s file”: absent from the file so far, which is not the same claim as having filed nothing. Source: FBI Crime Data Explorer, arrest data for agency record IA0070100.

Bias-motivated incidents in the FBI’s file

1 incident appears in the FBI’s hate crime file for Cedar Falls Police Department for 2007, as at 14 August 2026. The table lists every year from 1991 to 2025 for which the file has at least one.

Incidents appearing in the FBI’s file, as at 14 August 2026
YearIncidents appearing in the file
20071
19983
19961
19932
Bias motivation recorded, in the FBI’s words, 1993–2007
Bias motivationIncidents
Anti-Black or African American6
Anti-Gay (Male)1

Absence from this file is not a zero. The file lists incidents that were reported to the FBI. An agency can be missing from it because it recorded none, because it did not report, or because it does not take part in the FBI’s hate crime program, and nothing Police Census holds can tell these apart. In any one year the file lists incidents for only a minority of the agencies the FBI counts as reporting.

The figures are counts of incidents as they appear in the file, as at 14 August 2026; Police Census does not turn them into a rate and does not compare them with other agencies. Offence and bias wording is the FBI’s own, unaltered. Source: FBI Crime Data Explorer, additional datasets, hate crime bulk file, agency record IA0070100.

Deaths during encounters with this agency

1 person has died during an encounter with Cedar Falls Police Department between 2009 and 2009, according to the two datasets named below.

1Deaths recorded
2.40Per 100,000 people policed
2009–2009Period covered
Recorded causeDeaths
Gunshot1

What this figure is and is not. It counts deaths recorded as occurring during an encounter with this agency. It is not a finding of wrongdoing, and a death being recorded here says nothing about whether it was lawful. Many involve armed confrontations; some involve none. Police Census publishes counts only and does not name the people who died.

Source: every one of these records comes from Fatal Encounters, which records deaths from 2000–2021. They are not official statistics, and no federal database records this comprehensively. See Deaths for how these records are compiled.

Assaults on officers

Officers of Cedar Falls Police Department assaulted in the line of duty, by the weapon reported, between 2006 and 2025. These are the FBI’s own weapon categories.

Weapon reportedOfficers assaulted
Firearm1
Knife or other cutting instrument0
Hands, fists or feet32
Other weapon8
YearFirearmKnifeHands, fists, feetOther
20061031
20070030
20080001
20090020
20100020
20110020
20120020
20130020
20140012
20150031
20160040
20170013
20180010
20190030
20250030

Why there is no single total here. The FBI publishes two breakdowns of the same assaults — by weapon, and by how the officer was deployed — and nationally they do not agree: the assignment columns sum to 1,869,337 and the weapon columns to 1,744,852, and the two match on only 84% of rows. Police Census publishes the weapon breakdown as the FBI states it rather than picking one basis and calling it ‘the total’. The file’s ‘cleared’ column is not shown either: it sums higher than the assaults themselves, so it is not a subset of what is above and we have not established what it counts.

This comes from the FBI’s Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted programme. Despite the name, the file carries no officers-killed data at all — those columns are empty for every agency and every year, so this page reports assaults only and says nothing about officers killed.

LEOKA identifies agencies by name, not by the ORI used elsewhere on this site. A row was attached only where exactly one agency in that state reduces to the same base name; 78.7% of rows matched nationwide. An agency with nothing here may have reported no assaults, or may be one of the names that did not match — Police Census does not guess which.

Also policing Black Hawk

Jurisdictions overlap. These agencies are also recorded against the same county, so a single address may be covered by more than one of them.

Source

Agency identity, type, jurisdiction, coordinates and reporting status are as published by the FBI Crime Data Explorer, agency record IA0070100. Police Census reproduces these values without adjustment. Where the FBI publishes nothing, this page says so rather than estimating.

Believe something on this page is wrong? Tell us at corrections@policecensus.com — every correction is published on Corrections.